Cybernetics cover

Cybernetics
or Control and Communication
in the Animal and the Machine

Second Edition · MIT Press · 1961
被誉为信息时代的奠基之作,维纳在此书中创立了控制论(Cybernetics)学科, 将通信、控制与统计力学统一在同一个理论框架下, 深刻影响了人工智能、计算神经科学、自动化和社会学的发展。

Foreword

Doug Hill

Doug Hill

Foreword

Doug Hill

Doug Hill

Foreword

Doug Hill

Doug Hill

It tells you something about Norbert Wiener's qualifications as a prophet that Cybernetics has been republished twice since it first appeared in 1948, and that on each of those occasions his thoughts and predictions about the technologies he helped create have seemed more ingenious, more prescient, and, in some respects, more troubling. The New York Times acknowledged as much in 1965 when it turned over the front page of its prestigious book review section to Cybernetics' first reissue--­a rare editorial honor indeed for a book that was, at the time, seventeen years old.1 (The decision to grant cover status may have been influenced by the fact that a month earlier Wiener had won, posthumously, a National Book Award for God & Golem, Inc.) The Times' reviewer, John Pfeiffer, called Cybernetics "one of the finest intellectual adventure stories ever written." He also noted, however, that upon the book's initial publication, Wiener's warnings about the potential dangers of computer technology had created "something of a scandal." Three years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Americans were worried that scientists might not be able to contain the powers they'd unleashed. Wiener didn't reassure them.
诺伯特·维纳作为预言家的资质,从《控制论》自1948年首次出版以来已经重印两次这一事实中可见一斑——而且每一次重印时,他关于自己所帮助创造的技术的思考和预测,都显得更加巧妙、更有先见之明,并且在某些方面更加令人不安。《纽约时报》在1965年就承认了这一点,当时它把备受推崇的书评版头版献给了《控制论》的首次重印——对于一本当时已有十七年历史的书来说,这确实是罕见的编辑荣誉。1(决定给予封面地位可能受到一个月前维纳凭借《上帝与傀儡公司》死后获得美国国家图书奖的影响。)《纽约时报》的评论家约翰·法伊弗称《控制论》为"有史以来最精彩的智力冒险故事之一"。然而他也指出,在该书最初出版时,维纳关于计算机技术潜在危险的警告曾引起"某种丑闻"。在广岛和长崎三年后,美国人民担心科学家可能无法控制他们所释放的力量。维纳并没有安抚他们。

x

Foreword

His introduction concludes by noting his distress that those who contributed to the development of cybernetics, including himself, "stand in a moral position which is, to say the least, not very comfortable." The techniques emerging from their ideas, he said, could be used for evil as well as good, and it was obvious he expected they would be. True, he said, many of his colleagues held out hope that cybernetics could lead to "a better understanding of man and society." Speaking for himself, Wiener said, "I am compelled to say that it is a very slight hope." This latest reissue of Cybernetics likewise makes its appearance at a time when people are wondering whether we have our technologies firmly in control. And it's safe to say Wiener would not be surprised that those anxieties arise from just the sorts of technological power he wrote about in 1948.
他的引言在结尾处指出,那些为控制论发展做出贡献的人——包括他自己——"所处的道德立场至少可以说是非常不舒适的"。他说,从他们的思想中涌现的技术既可以用于邪恶,也可以用于善良,而且很明显他预期它们会被用于邪恶。
The likely impact of automation on employment is an example. Over the past few years, a plethora of articles, books, studies, and conferences have warned, often alarmingly, that advances in artificial intelligence and robotics pose a significant threat to a significant number of jobs. Some of these postulate that half or more of all jobs could soon be replaced.
自动化对就业的可能影响就是一个例子。在过去几年中,大量的文章、书籍、研究和会议都警告说,人工智能和机器人技术的进步对数以百万计的工作岗位构成重大威胁——有些警告令人震惊。
"This will be the fastest transition humankind has experienced," said Kai-­Fu Lee, an AI expert who has held executive positions at Google, Microsoft, and Apple, "and we're not ready for it."2 Recent reports of thriving employment don't disprove automation's impact; the decisive factor is how many of those jobs offer meaningful employment at a living wage, especially for unskilled workers.3 Two MIT economists, Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, say we're witnessing the birth of the "Second Machine Age." In an interview with the Harvard Business Review, McAfee noted that digital technologies are doing for human brainpower what the steam engine and related technologies did
"这将是人类经历的最快转型,"曾在谷歌、微软和苹果担任高管的人工智能专家李开复说,"而我们还没有为此做好准备。"2近期就业繁荣的报告并不能反驳自动化的影响;决定性因素在于这些工作中有多少能提供有意义的就业和维持生活的工资,特别是对于非熟练工人而言。3

Foreword

xi

for human muscle power during the Industrial Revolution (aka the First Machine Age).4 If that doesn't sound familiar, it will after reading Cybernetics, where Wiener uses exactly the same comparison. Wiener notes in the book that he'd attempted to alert the labor unions of the threats posed by automation to their membership. With a few exceptions, he said, he found union leadership "totally unprepared to enter into the larger political, technical, sociological, and economic questions which concern the very existence of labor." Today we seem more willing to talk about those questions.
两位麻省理工学院的经济学家埃里克·布林约尔松和安德鲁·麦卡菲表示,我们正在目睹"第二次机器时代"的诞生。在接受《哈佛商业评论》采访时,麦卡菲指出,数字技术正在为人类大脑做的事情,正如蒸汽机及相关技术在工业革命(即第一次机器时代)中为人类肌肉力量所做的一样。4如果这听起来不熟悉,那么在阅读《控制论》之后就会熟悉了——维纳在书中使用了完全相同的比喻。
Whether we're willing to do something about them is another question. The potentially ruinous impact of communication technologies on democracy is another issue that Wiener anticipated with uncanny accuracy. The most fundamental conviction of cybernetic theory is that it all comes down to messages (i.e., information) sent and responded to (i.e., feedback).
维纳在书中指出,他曾试图提醒工会注意自动化对其成员构成的威胁。他说,除了少数例外,他发现工会领导层"完全没有准备去处理那些关乎劳动本身存在的更大的政治、技术、社会学和经济问题"。今天我们似乎更愿意谈论这些问题。但我们是否愿意为此采取行动则是另一个问题。
The functionality of a machine, organism, or society depends on the quality of those messages. Faithful exchanges of information allow the machine, organism, or society to maintain a state of homeostasis. Information corrupted by various forms of noise leads to the opposite.
通信技术对民主的潜在破坏性影响是维纳以惊人准确性预见的另一个问题。控制论理论最基本的信念是,一切都归结为发送和响应的消息(即信息)以及反馈。机器、有机体或社会的功能取决于这些消息的质量。信息忠实的交换使机器、有机体或社会能够维持稳定状态。被各种形式的噪声所污染的信息则导致相反的结果。
In Cybernetics, Wiener calls the mass media of his day the single greatest anti-­homeostatic influence in modern society. One wishes that the techno-­utopians of Silicon Valley had heeded his point that genuine community extends only so far as the transmission of effective--­meaning homeostatic--­information. As the scale, scope, and speed of information technologies have increased, so has the potential for corruption.
在《控制论》中,维纳称他那个时代的大众传媒是现代社会中最强大的反稳定因素。人们希望硅谷的技术乌托邦主义者能够重视他的观点:真正的社群只能延伸到有效——即稳定——信息所能传递的范围。随着信息技术的规模、范围与速度的增长,信息被污染的可能性也随之增加。
Certainly Mark Zuckerberg failed to appreciate that Facebook's "global community" of two billion users would inevitably produce countless messages that were antithetical to homeostasis, and thus to genuine community.
马克·扎克伯格显然没有认识到,Facebook拥有二十亿用户的"全球社群"将不可避免地产生无数与稳定状态——因而也与真正的社群——背道而驰的消息。

xii

Foreword

That the routine operation of computer technologies can lead to disaster was a point Wiener stressed repeatedly. Thinking machines are relentlessly literal-minded, he said. They mechanically perform the tasks we ask them to, even though their interpretation of those tasks may be diametrically opposed to what we had in mind.
维纳反复强调的一个观点是,计算机技术的常规操作可能导致灾难。他说,思维机器是不折不扣的字面主义者。它们机械地执行我们要求的任务,即使它们对这些任务的解释可能与我们的意图截然相反。
So it is that Facebook's algorithms have posted videos of murders as efficiently as they've posted videos of marriages. Speed is another routine feature of automation that Wiener frequently warned could thwart our intentions. As he put it in a 1960 essay for Science magazine, "By the very slowness of our human actions, our effective control of our machines may be nullified.
因此,Facebook的算法发布谋杀视频的效率与其发布婚礼视频的效率一样高。速度是自动化的另一个常规特征,维纳经常警告说速度可能会破坏我们的意图。正如他在1960年为《科学》杂志撰写的一篇文章中所说:"由于我们人类行动的缓慢,我们对机器的有效控制可能被取消。"
By the time we are able to react to information conveyed by our senses and stop the car we are driving, it may already have run head-on into a wall."5 He was using the car image metaphorically, of course; the fatal accidents involving Tesla's and Uber's automated vehicles were still many decades in the future. Still, during those decades we've become ever more dependent on any number of complex computer systems that aren't as stable as we like to think. The failure of a relay switch in a power station in Niagara Falls, New York, on November 9, 1965, triggered a series of mechanical and electrical events that blacked out power to the entire northeastern United States and significant portions of Canada; now we're warned that Russian hackers may be as interested in disrupting America's power grid as they have been in disrupting its elections.6 In 2010, computerized trading programs were blamed for a "flash crash" on Wall Street, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged more than 900 points in a matter of minutes.
当我们能够对我们的感官所传达的信息做出反应并停下我们驾驶的汽车时,它可能已经迎头撞上了墙壁。"5当然,他使用汽车的意象是比喻性的;特斯拉和优步的自动驾驶汽车造成的致命事故还要等几十年才能到来。然而,在这几十年里,我们变得越来越依赖那些并不像我们以为的那样稳定的复杂计算机系统。1965年11月9日,纽约尼亚加拉大瀑布一座发电站的一个继电器开关的故障,触发了一系列事件,导致整个美国东北部以及加拿大安大略省部分地区陷入黑暗。
"We have a market that responds in milliseconds," said a finance expert quoted by the New York Times, "but the humans monitoring respond
"我们有一个以毫秒为单位响应的市场,"《纽约时报》援引一位金融专家的话说,"但监控市场的电脑前的人类需要几分钟才能做出响应,而不幸的是,在此期间可能发生数十亿美元的损失。"那次股市迅速反弹,但摩根大通2018年的一份报告警告说,更严重的崩盘可能正在来临。

Foreword

xiii

in minutes, and unfortunately billions of dollars of damage can occur in the meantime." Stocks rebounded quickly on that occasion, but a 2018 report from J.P. Morgan warned that a more extensive crash spurred by electronic trading algorithms could lead to social chaos.7 Given the profits they engender, it's unlikely we'll stop using electronic trading programs anytime soon, which points to the driver of technological folly that most enraged Wiener: greed, for both money and power. He regularly railed against the "hucksters" in commerce and "gadget worshippers" in science whose cupidity leads irrevocably, he believed, to "no homeostasis whatever." Readers will find piquant examples of Wiener's disdain for the captains of capitalist industry in Cybernetics; here's one from his follow-­up book, The Human Use of Human Beings: So long as anything remained of the rich endowment of nature with which we started, our national hero has been the exploiter who has done the most to turn this endowment into ready cash.
在那次事件中,股票迅速反弹,但摩根大通2018年的一份报告警告说,更广泛的崩盘——可能由高频交易程序引发——可能即将来临。鉴于电子交易程序带来的利润,我们不太可能很快停止使用它们——这正指向了最令维纳愤怒的技术愚蠢的驱动因素:贪婪,对金钱和权力的贪婪。他经常抨击商业中的"奸商"和科学中的"装备崇拜者",他认为他们的贪婪不可避免地导致"完全没有稳定状态"。
In our theories of free enterprise, we have exalted him as if he had been the creator of the riches which he has stolen and squandered. We have lived for the day of our prosperity, and we have hoped that some benevolent heaven would forgive our excesses and make life possible for our impoverished grandchildren. This is what is known as the fifth freedom.
在我们自己的自由企业理论中,我们把他奉若神明,仿佛他是那些被他偷窃和挥霍的财富的创造者。我们为繁荣的日子而活,并希望某个仁慈的上帝会原谅我们的过激行为,使我们贫困的子子孙孙能够弥补我们留下的亏空。在这些条件下,发明所赋予的新资源自然被转向更为迅速地开发我们土地的资源。
Under these conditions, the new resources given by invention have naturally been turned to the even more rapid exploitation of the resources of our soil. ... This game has another name than that of war. It is also called beggar-­your-­neighbor.8
在这场游戏中,赢家就是那些最迅速、最无情地掠夺共同遗产、将其转化为个人财富并将其挥霍殆尽的人。读者在《控制论》中会找到维纳对资本主义工业巨头蔑视的辛辣例子。
Where did this willingness to so vehemently attack the powers that be come from? The same place, I suspect, that accounted for the magnificent originality of Wiener's science, and also for the notorious difficulties of his personality. That place was his childhood.
这种愿意如此猛烈抨击当权者的态度从何而来?我猜想,它来自于与维纳科学中非凡原创性的同一源泉,也来自于他个性中众所周知的难以相处之处。那个源泉就是他的童年。

xiv

Foreword

Wiener showed signs of genius almost from infancy. According to Dark Hero of the Information Age, the superb biography by Flo Conway and Jim Siegelman, he was reading by the age of three and reciting in Greek and Latin by the age of five. As a child, he was consuming books of philosophy and literature that would enrich his writing as an adult.
维纳几乎从婴儿时期就显示出天才的迹象。根据弗洛·康威和吉姆·西格尔曼所著的优秀传记《信息时代的黑暗英雄》,他三岁时就能阅读,五岁时能用希腊语和拉丁语背诵。童年时期,他就大量阅读哲学和文学书籍——这些阅读将丰富他成年后的写作。
By the time he was ten, he was studying chemistry, geometry, physics, botany, and zoology; by the age of eleven, he'd entered college. He earned his undergraduate degree in mathematics from Tufts at fourteen, spent a year studying philosophy at Cornell, and earned his doctorate with a thesis on mathematical logic from Harvard at seventeen.9 Wiener joined the faculty of MIT at the age of 23 and remained there until his death in 1964. Like many, if not most, prodigies, Wiener emerged from childhood bearing psychological scars, many inflicted by his father.
到十岁时,他已经学习化学、几何、物理、植物学和动物学;十一岁时,他上了大学。他十四岁时在塔夫茨大学获得数学学士学位,在康奈尔大学学习了一年哲学,十七岁时在哈佛大学以一篇数理逻辑论文获得博士学位。9维纳在二十三岁时加入麻省理工学院数学系。
Unable to find a public or private school that could keep up with his son, Leo Wiener, an instructor in Slavic languages and literature at Harvard, began teaching him at home. The course of study was expansive in the subject areas it covered but brutal in its execution. In the first volume of his autobiography, Ex-Prodigy: My Childhood and Youth (like Cybernetics, a surprise best seller), Wiener recalls a regimen of "systematic belittling." Mistakes were greeted by explosions of temper, his father progressing rapidly from demanding teacher to "avenger of blood." This explains the title Wiener had originally chosen for his memoir: "The Bent Twig."10 His academic precocity made Wiener a minor celebrity--­a newspaper profile on the occasion of his entry into Tufts called him "The Most Remarkable Boy in the World"11--­but did him no favors socially.
由于找不到任何一所公私立的学校能够跟得上他儿子的步伐,哈佛大学斯拉夫语言文学讲师利奥·维纳开始在家教他。课程是严格的,扩展到希腊语和拉丁语,以及科学和数学。然而,即使他年纪轻轻就表现出色,维纳的童年还是充满了孤独和焦虑。
His physical clumsiness, his poor eyesight, and his Jewishness further contributed to his profound and
他的身体笨拙、视力不佳以及他的犹太人身份,进一步加剧了他内心深处、永久性的自我认同为局外人。维纳在职业和个人方面都因其独特性而受苦。

Foreword

xv

permanent self-identification as an outsider. Wiener suffered, professionally as well as personally, from his uniqueness, but he also used it. As he put it in the second volume of his autobiography, I Am a Mathematician, "I knew very well that I was competitive beyond the run of younger mathematicians, and I knew equally that this was not a pretty attitude.
但他学会了利用自己的局外人身份来驱动他的创造力。正如他在自传《我是一个数学家》中所写:"我学会了——不是完全自觉的,而是在某种意义上——用我的差异作为动力,而不是借口。"
However, it was not an attitude which I was free to assume or to reject. I was quite aware that I was an out among ins and that I would get no shred of recognition that I did not force. If I was not to be welcomed, well then, let me be too dangerous to be ignored."12 Cybernetics shows frequent evidence of Wiener's substantial ego, but just as often shows his willingness to share credit with his collaborators and other workers in the field.
然而,这并不是我可以自由选择或拒绝的态度。我非常清楚自己是局内人中的局外人,是一个受压迫种族的成员……我意识到我的胆怯和我在社交上的不自在……正是这种差异让我的工作有了价值,让我有了别人无法轻易替代的东西。
Claude Shannon, whose reputation as the father of information theory would come to overshadow Wiener's, receives several mentions. (Shannon earned his masters and doctorate degrees at MIT and, according to Conway and Siegelman, spent considerable time talking to Wiener about cybernetics there.) The text is also peppered with examples of Wiener's literary and philosophical chops; it's not often we encounter pages of mathematical formulae interspersed with name-­dropping references to the likes of Balzac and Hume, Kipling and Carroll. It's likely that the breadth of Wiener's erudition and ambition contributed to his eclipse by Shannon. As the subtitle of Cybernetics shows, Wiener set out to explain how information is the lingua franca of both animal and machine, a mission that consciously involved exploring, as he put it, "the boundary regions of science." Thus, cybernetics as Wiener conceived it is physically embodied--­understanding the workings of the human brain and nervous system was a central goal, though at one point Wiener studied signal transmission in the nerve fibers
克劳德·香农,作为信息论之父,其声誉后来将超越维纳,他在书中多次被提及,但总是作为维纳的次要人物出现。这种待遇反映了一个事实:尽管香农在数学通信理论方面做出了开创性工作,但维纳的控制论视野更为广泛。

xvi

Foreword

of cats--yet consciously holistic and theoretically unlimited. As the historian Steve J. Heims put it, cybernetics "leads to a more unified view of the world, including its human inhabitants, where everything is connected to everything else."13 Shannon's information theory, by contrast, is both highly abstract and intensely practical, resolutely focused on moving electronic messages from point A to point B.
控制论涵盖了从工程学到生物学、从神经科学到社会学的广泛领域,具有自觉的整体性和理论上的无限性。正如历史学家史蒂夫·J·海姆斯所说,控制论"导致了关于生命、心智和社会的全新思维方式"。
For him, wrote the literary scholar N. Katherine Hayles, information is emphatically disembodied, "a probability function with no dimensions, no materiality, and no necessary connection with meaning."14 With the advent of digital technology, Shannon's more circumscribed approach paradoxically lent itself more readily to a host of real-­life applications--­they're at work in the smartphones, fitness trackers, and countless other devices we use today. So it is that Shannon has typically received credit for jump-­starting the computer revolution while Wiener's legacy remained relatively obscure.
对他而言,正如文学学者N·凯瑟琳·海尔斯所写,信息是明确非具身的,"一种概率函数,与占据空间的物质形态分属不同类别"。
Many scientists believe that is changing. In the burgeoning age of artificial intelligence, the line between human and machine is becoming increasingly blurred. Cybernetics was far ahead of its time in anticipating how fruitful those parallels could be.15 There were personal as well as theoretical reasons for Wiener's fading.
许多科学家认为这种情况正在改变。在人工智能蓬勃发展的时代,人与机器之间的界限正在变得模糊,维纳对此既不会感到惊讶,也不会感到欣慰。
His books made him a nationally recognized figure, but he used that fame to take principled public stands against the use of science--­his science--­to develop new ways to wage war, exploit labor, and destroy the environment. In these concerns he was, again, far ahead of his time, as well as uncommonly outspoken. In an article for the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, he said that "the degradation of the position of the scientist as an independent worker and thinker to that of a morally irresponsible stooge in a science-­factory has proceeded even more rapidly
他的著作使他成为全国知名人物,但他利用这种名声,在原则立场上反对将技术用于压迫性和破坏性的目的。他拒绝接受政府资助,拒绝参与军事研究,并公开警告自动化可能带来的社会后果。

Foreword

xvii

and devastatingly than I had expected."16 Putting his money, and his career, where his mouth was, Wiener refused to take on research funded by the military, which effectively excluded him from much of the cutting-­edge work in computers at a crucial moment in their history. (I can imagine Wiener smiling with approval of the Google engineers who insisted in 2018 that the company withdraw from its commitments to develop advanced AI capabilities for the Pentagon.17) Wiener also declined offers from corporations who sought his advice on automating their factories. "Those who suffer from a power complex," he wrote in The Human Use of Human Beings, "find the mechanization of man a simple way to realize their ambitions."18 The impact of Wiener's ideas was also undermined by his own demons. According to Conway and Siegelman, he suffered from periods of severe depression during which he would lose control of his emotions, breaking into sobbing or shouting fits at the slightest provocation.
他言出必行,也付出了职业生涯的代价。维纳拒绝接受与军方有关的研究资助,这使他在麻省理工学院的一些同事中不受欢迎,也限制了他在冷战时期美国科学界的晋升机会。
More than once he threatened suicide. Wiener's colleagues at MIT, although mostly unaware of those episodes, nonetheless at times found him imperious, temperamental, maddeningly absent-­minded, and neurotically self-­absorbed. Perhaps most important, Conway and Siegelman report that in 1951 Wiener abruptly abandoned leadership of a new neurophysiology laboratory at MIT--­one that held immense promise for furthering the growth of cybernetics--­after his wife convinced him, falsely, that more than one of his partners in the venture had seduced his nineteen-­year-­old daughter.
他不止一次威胁要自杀。维纳在麻省理工学院的同事虽然大多不知道这些事件,但仍然发现他难以相处——情绪波动大,有时偏执,很容易感到被轻视。
Wiener's fears that his colleagues were attempting to steal credit for cybernetics made him more likely to believe the story.19 Reviewers of Ex-­Prodigy remarked that, despite his many successes, Wiener's life story seemed imbued with sadness. His writings reveal a deep skepticism about human nature. Earlier,
维纳担心他的同事试图窃取控制论的功劳,这使他更容易相信最坏的阴谋。然而,他对外部世界的判断却常常惊人地准确。

xviii

Foreword

I mentioned Wiener's comment that he used his outsider status to fuel his creative drive. Steve Heims noted a similar sentiment in a journal article Wiener cowrote, criticizing Rudyard Kipling for his "fear-­based conformity." In a comment that could easily have reflected Wiener's view of himself, the piece added, "The marginal man is always relatively the more civilized human being."20 Throughout his life, Wiener harbored another conviction that in my view was equally important in fueling his genius, and that was his recognition of uncertainty. It's remarkable that at the age of ten he wrote a paper entitled "The Theory of Ignorance," in which he proclaimed "the impossibility of man's being certain of anything." He mentions the paper in the second volume of his autobiography.
我提到过维纳的评论,即他利用自己的局外人身份来驱动创造力。史蒂夫·海姆斯注意到维纳身上有类似的特质:一种永久的知识分子不安感,驱使着他不断探索新的领域。
"Even at that time," he wrote, "I was struck by the impossibility of originating a perfectly tight theory with the aid of so loose a mechanism as the human mind." A key moment on his path to cybernetics came when he discovered the statistical mechanics theories of his scientific hero, Josiah Willard Gibbs, whose applications of probability demonstrated, Wiener said, that chance is part of the "warp and weft" of physics. This in turn affirmed his belief that it would be a mistake to view the world as purely rational.21 That Wiener's warnings about technology haven't been heeded in the long run isn't surprising; technological advance and enthusiasm for technological advance have been drowning out the warnings of skeptics for centuries. The surprise was that Cybernetics and his other books and articles received as much initial attention as they did.
"即使在那个时候,"他写道,"我也被一种想法所震撼,即仅凭当时可用的数学工具,不可能建立一个完全严谨的理论。"这种不安促使他发展出新的数学方法,包括后来被称为维纳滤波器的理论。
Nonetheless, the attitudes of the public do seem to have shifted in his direction. After years of enamored embrace of Google, Facebook, Amazon, YouTube, and any number of other internet attractions, a host of problems--­loss of
尽管如此,公众的态度似乎确实已经向他的方向转变。经过多年对谷歌、Facebook和亚马逊等技术巨头的迷恋拥抱之后,公众对它们日益增长的权力、侵犯隐私和反竞争行为的担忧已经显著增加。

Foreword

xix

privacy, tech addiction, and subverted elections among them--has, for many, provoked serious doubts. And it's not just the users who are having second thoughts.22 In several of his works, including this one, Wiener mentions Goethe's "The Sorcerer's Apprentice," "The Fisherman and the Genie" from One Thousand and One Nights, and W. Jacobs's short story, "The Monkey's Paw." In one way or another, the protagonists of all three tales end up asking themselves how the magic they thought would deliver them could have gone so horribly wrong.
隐私问题、技术成瘾和被操纵的选举——这些只是其中一部分——已经引发了许多人的严重质疑。而且不仅仅是公众,硅谷内部人士也开始发声。
A series of scandals, beginning with revelations of social media's contributions to the election of Donald Trump, has caused many of Silicon Valley's would-­be wizards to ask themselves, belatedly, the same question. Doug Hill is the author of Not So Fast: Thinking Twice About Technology.
一系列丑闻,从社交媒体在唐纳德·特朗普当选中的作用被揭露开始,已经使大型科技公司处于守势。国会听证会、反垄断调查和新的隐私法规接踵而至。

Foreword

⋮
选中章节开始听书
1.0x